Streamlining Medication Management

Streamlining Medication Management

Leading a team of four designers in an end-to-end project designing an app to track, manage, and understand medications and their side effects

Leading a team of four designers in an end-to-end project designing an app to track, manage, and understand medications and their side effects

Role

Role

Project Manager

Project Manager

Methods & Tools

Methods & Tools

Figma, FigJam, User Interviews, Competitor Analysis, A/B Testing, Prototyping, Roadmapping

Figma, FigJam, User Interviews, Competitor Analysis, A/B Testing, Prototyping, Roadmapping

Team

Team

1 Project Manager, 4 UX Designers

1 Project Manager, 4 UX Designers

Timeline

Timeline

October 2025 - December 2025

October 2025 - December 2025

OVERVIEW

OVERVIEW

Context

Context

Risk & Safety Solutions is a B2B SaaS company in Environmental Health & Safety that provides software services for research labs, health centers, and workplaces, primarily for the University of California system. This case study addresses a new feature set within the software solution to support campus ergonomists in tracking and addressing ergonomic need for employees.

Risk & Safety Solutions is a B2B SaaS company in Environmental Health & Safety that provides software services for research labs, health centers, and workplaces, primarily for the University of California system. This case study addresses a new feature set within the software solution to support campus ergonomists in tracking and addressing ergonomic need for employees.

Ergonomists often need to piece together an employee’s history across multiple assessments and evaluations. The existing workflow made it difficult to locate relevant documentation and quickly extract information needed to make decisions.

Ergonomists often need to piece together an employee’s history across multiple assessments and evaluations. The existing workflow made it difficult to locate relevant documentation and quickly extract information needed to make decisions.

Impact

Impact

I defined research questions, developed usability testing tasks, conducted sessions, coded transcripts, synthesized behavioral and verbal data, and presented actionable recommendations to product stakeholders.

I defined research questions, developed usability testing tasks, conducted sessions, coded transcripts, synthesized behavioral and verbal data, and presented actionable recommendations to product stakeholders.

TESTING PLAN

TESTING PLAN

Usability testing was selected to assess both the utility and usability of our new feature set. Since this was unfamiliar to our ergonomist user base, their feedback was essential for refining the solution. I defined a high-level research goals and specific research questions to guide our testing and focus our evaluation of usability and utility.

Usability testing was selected to assess both the utility and usability of our new feature set. Since this was unfamiliar to our ergonomist user base, their feedback was essential for refining the solution. I defined a high-level research goals and specific research questions to guide our testing and focus our evaluation of usability and utility.

Research Goal

Research Goal

Evaluate how efficiently and effectively the prototype features allow ergonomists to locate relevant self-assessment data, form decisions, communicate findings, and take appropriate action.

Evaluate how efficiently and effectively the prototype features allow ergonomists to locate relevant self-assessment data, form decisions, communicate findings, and take appropriate action.

Research Questions

Research Questions

UTILITY EVALUATION

UTILITY EVALUATION

  • To what degree do features and navigation align with ergonomists’ existing workflow?

  • Does the information presented align in content, format, and level of detail with ergonomists’ needs for completing their job tasks?

  • To what degree do features and navigation align with ergonomists’ existing workflow?

  • Does the information presented align in content, format, and level of detail with ergonomists’ needs for completing their job tasks?

USABILITY EVALUATION

USABILITY EVALUATION

  • How easily can ergonomists locate and act on the relevant information they are seeking?

  • How easily can ergonomists locate and use additional features (e.g., AI Assistant) to support their tasks?

  • How easily can ergonomists navigate to and from the search results?

  • How easily can ergonomists locate and act on the relevant information they are seeking?

  • How easily can ergonomists locate and use additional features (e.g., AI Assistant) to support their tasks?

  • How easily can ergonomists navigate to and from the search results?

Participant Recruitment

Participant Recruitment

6 ergonomists from UC and CSU campuses participated in moderated usability testing. Participants represented a range of campus contexts and experience levels with the platform.

6 ergonomists from UC and CSU campuses participated in moderated usability testing. Participants represented a range of campus contexts and experience levels with the platform.

TESTING TASKS

TESTING TASKS

DISCLAIMER: All user data shown is test data. Some sections are blurred, such as document owners, to protect the privacy of team members whose names and emails were used to generate the test data.

DISCLAIMER: All user data shown is test data. Some sections are blurred, such as document owners, to protect the privacy of team members whose names and emails were used to generate the test data.

We used a think-aloud protocol, asking participants to verbalize their thoughts as they completed tasks based on the following scenario: S.R. is a long-term employee who previously had an ergonomics evaluation and recently requested additional ergonomic support.

We used a think-aloud protocol, asking participants to verbalize their thoughts as they completed tasks based on the following scenario: S.R. is a long-term employee who previously had an ergonomics evaluation and recently requested additional ergonomic support.

Task

Task

What Was Evaluated

What Was Evaluated

Search

Search

Could participants locate S.R.’s records?

Could participants locate S.R.’s records?

Document Identification

Document Identification

Could they identify the correct assessment/evaluation within S.R.’s records?

Could they identify the correct assessment/evaluation within S.R.’s records?

AI Assistant

AI Assistant

Could they discover and use supporting tools to extract information from the assessment?

Could they discover and use supporting tools to extract information from the assessment?

ANALYSIS & SYNTHESIS

ANALYSIS & SYNTHESIS

I imported session recordings and transcripts into Dovetail and developed a tagging taxonomy to systematically code verbal and behavioral data. I then affinity-mapped coded observations and used a rainbow chart to compare participant behaviors across tasks.

I imported session recordings and transcripts into Dovetail and developed a tagging taxonomy to systematically code verbal and behavioral data. I then affinity-mapped coded observations and used a rainbow chart to compare participant behaviors across tasks.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

I combined findings from verbal and behavioral observations to generate clear, actionable insights and design recommendations for RSS stakeholders.

I combined findings from verbal and behavioral observations to generate clear, actionable insights and design recommendations for RSS stakeholders.

01: Search Wasn’t Discoverable

01: Search Wasn’t Discoverable

OBSERVATION

Several participants overlooked the search bar and tried alternative ways to locate employees

OBSERVATION

Several participants overlooked the search bar and tried alternative ways to locate employees

INSIGHT

The current interface doesn’t clearly communicate that search is the primary method for finding employee records

INSIGHT

The current interface doesn’t clearly communicate that search is the primary method for finding employee records

RECOMMENDATION

Increase search prominence and provide clearer affordances around what users can search for

RECOMMENDATION

Increase search prominence and provide clearer affordances around what users can search for

02: Document cards lacked decision-critical information

OBSERVATION

Participants struggled to distinguish self-assessments from professional evaluations and interpret dates

INSIGHT

Users don’t have enough contextual information to confidently select the correct document

RECOMMENDATION

Add document type, submission date, and other decision-critical metadata to document cards

03: Centralized information was valuable, but AI Assistant was hard to discover

03: Centralized information was valuable, but AI Assistant was hard to discover

OBSERVATION

Participants valued seeing all documents in one place, but 5/6 needed guidance to find the AI Summary.

OBSERVATION

Participants valued seeing all documents in one place, but 5/6 needed guidance to find the AI Summary.

INSIGHT

Centralization reduced information fragmentation, but the AI feature wasn’t discoverable enough to become part of the workflow

INSIGHT

Centralization reduced information fragmentation, but the AI feature wasn’t discoverable enough to become part of the workflow

RECOMMENDATION

Increase salience of the AI Assistant and surface summaries within the document workflow

RECOMMENDATION

Increase salience of the AI Assistant and surface summaries within the document workflow

PROJECT OUTCOMES

PROJECT OUTCOMES

Research findings were presented to product leadership, designers, product owners, and developers and directly informed subsequent design work.

Research findings were presented to product leadership, designers, product owners, and developers and directly informed subsequent design work.

Next Steps

Next Steps

  • Improve search discoverability

  • Add metadata needed for document identification

  • Increase visibility of AI-generated summaries

  • Explore scheduling/tracking workflows for future iterations

  • Improve search discoverability

  • Add metadata needed for document identification

  • Increase visibility of AI-generated summaries

  • Explore scheduling/tracking workflows for future iterations

The recommendations from the testing insights are being implemented for the next release of the solution.

The recommendations from the testing insights are being implemented for the next release of the solution.

REFLECTION

REFLECTION

This project strengthened my ability to independently plan and execute usability research, systematically analyze qualitative data, and translate behavioral findings into product recommendations. One area I’d improve is defining the coding taxonomy earlier to improve consistency across sessions. I would also create an executive summary earlier so stakeholders can access the highest-impact findings quickly.

This project strengthened my ability to independently plan and execute usability research, systematically analyze qualitative data, and translate behavioral findings into product recommendations. One area I’d improve is defining the coding taxonomy earlier to improve consistency across sessions. I would also create an executive summary earlier so stakeholders can access the highest-impact findings quickly.

Let’s Connect.

© 2026 Deepa Bhat. All Rights Reserved

Thanks for stopping by!

Let’s Connect.

© 2026 Deepa Bhat. All Rights Reserved

Thanks for stopping by!

Let’s Connect.

© 2026 Deepa Bhat. All Rights Reserved

Thanks for stopping by!